The initial concern at the project site was focused on potentially hazardous conditions on a 400 ft. high rock cut which was adjacent to and behind a commercial building located in West Virginia (see Figure 1). The bottom of this rock cut, which was the result of the land development, exposed a coal seam that had been mined over 70 years ago. This old coal mine structure, which was supporting this very high rock face, was deteriorating as it was being exposed to the elements.


In addition to the existing rock cut concerns, MEA, a UES Company, discovered during its investigations that evidence existed that subsidence had already occurred at the existing commercial building. According to a survey done around the building, about 4 in. of subsidence had occurred, resulting in localized ponding on its flat roof. Under further investigation, it was found that the building rested on another abandoned coal mine which operated from the 1940s to the late 1960s. Based on information collected from drilling into these old coal workings, the mine was found to be open, dry and about 160 ft. deep.
Based on rock testing and MEA’s stability calculations, it was found that the coal mine had limited stability under the northern half of the building which meant there was a high risk of subsidence in the future. However, an acceptable amount of risk existed over the southern portion of the underlying old works (see Figure 1). Therefore, the noted settlement of the building was consistent with the risk analysis performed across the building.
Given the assessed range of risk under the building, the owner chose to only grout stabilize the northern half and saved about $3 million. This was in lieu of stabilizing the entire mine beneath the structure, which would be conventionally done.

Summary
Two separate levels of old coal workings were stabilized because of the potential hazards to an existing commercial building if either mine were to fail. Based on the engineering risk analyses performed, about half of the coal mine beneath the store was not remediated as the risk of failure was assessed to be very low. With confidence in the risk assessment, a savings of about $3 million was realized when compared to the conventional approach of stabilizing the entire mine. Reliable and proper risk based analysis, however, requires an adequately trained and experienced engineer with a successful track record.
